Log in

No account? Create an account
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
old movies

fter working my way through the last round of DVD's, I found myself needing some more entertainment. I haven't been able to get home and get my newly increased Netflix movies, yet I can't very well be spending $50+ per week on movies. But I needed something. Then I discovered Vina Distributor. They make region free, super-budget DVD's of old films and TV shows. They have no special features, no subtitles, no language dubs, and questionable practices with concern to the printing of the case jacket.

But they're cheap. We're talking $3.33 cheap.

I figure, if nothing else, I can probably turn them in a pawn shop for a buck if I decide not keep them. I sat in the floor of the Flying J truckstop and rifled through the cases, looking for the gems among the utter crap. Here's what I got, along with some notes and mini-reviews.

College (1927)
Buster Keaton plays Ronald, a brainy momma's boy who pursues collegiate athletics to impress a girl. Hilarity and hijinks insue. Made the same year as The General, but nowhere near as ambitious or engaging as that film. Still very entertaining and funny. Keaton's black-face scene, posing as a "colored" waiter might be offensive to some. Recommendation: only for fans of Keaton and silent comedies.

The Lady Vanishes (1938)
I'm certainly no authority on Hitchcock, in fact my experience with his films is limited to Psycho, Rear Window, The Birds and Vertigo. I am interested in becoming one, however: I have all of his films lined up in my Netflix queue for me to devour at some point in time. So, I wasn't sure what to expect from this, one of his earlier films. I have to admit, I was mildly surprised. It's a good old-fashioned train mystery with some Hitchcock twists, turns, and humor along the way. Recommendation: far from a must-see, but highly entertaining.

The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934)
The case claims "Alfred Hitchcock at his very best." It lies. Not that I was expecting anything along the lines of Rear Window or Psycho, but after having been impressed with The Lady Vanishes I had some hopes. It's not suspenseful at all and rather boring. It's only redeeming value are the scenes with Peter Lorre who is just too deliciously creepy for words. This is not to be confused with Hithcock's remake of this movie in 1956, with Doris Day and Jimmy Stewart. Recommendation: only for Hitchcock completists and Peter Lorre fans.

The Terror (1963)
Roger Corman is one of the film industry's most prolific producer-slash-directors, having made over 200 "B" genre films spanning a 50 year career. On the case of this title, it states that this film was directed by "Roger Corman and Francis Ford Coppola" which is blatantly wrong; Coppola was an associate producer according to the film credits, which basically means he had some money in it and nothing else. Among Corman's many achievements and gifts, he is often credited with having introduced the film world to a young actor named Jack Nicholson, who he utilized as a patient of the sadistic dentist in his production of Little Shop of Horrors. Corman gives Nicholson considerably more screen time with a lead role in this film, as a lieutenant in Napoleon's army who has been seperated from his company and stumbles upon a mysterious castle inhabited by Baron Von Leppe, portrayed by an aging Boris Karloff. The editing is rough, the acting is over-the-top melodrama, the dialogue is dodgy, the score is overbearing, and there are ample historical blunders (Nicholson is packing a revolver for most of the film). And yet, overall, the movie is 100% compelling and entertaining with a surprise plot twist that you don't see coming. Recommendation: a must for B-movie buffs.

The Outlaw (1943)
After seeing The Aviator a few weeks ago, it was only fitting to find this sitting on the shelf for me to uncover. This controversial film was shelved for six years because director Howard Hughes refused to backdown from Hollywood censors who insisted that he cut certain scenes which showed just a little too much of Jane Russell's ample cleavage. Of course, by today's standards these depictions are extremely tame and this film wouldn't receive anything more than a PG rating, but at the time it caused quite a stir. Prurient boob gawking aside, the film doesn't offer much else. Everything about it is cliche, from the one-dimensional American cinema western characters who treat women like horses and vice-versa to a score which literally employs the "wah wah wah waaaah" sound when someone tells a bad joke on screen. Recomendation: of interest only to film buffs for its historical importance pushing the envelope of "decency" in film and for being Jane Russell's cinematic debut.

There's only one more film I haven't gotten to yet, Corrupt Lieutenant starring Harvey Keitel and John Lydon (of Sex Pistols/Public Image Ltd. fame). There are also two discs which aren't films: one is a collection of episodes from The Jack Benny Show and the other is a collection of scenes and sketches from Stuart Shapiro, known for his work on the television show "Night Flight" back inthe 80's and the cult-film Mondo New York.

  • 1
Hey Soopa,

Have you seen either "What happened to Baby Jane" or
"Tree Grows in Brooklyn"?

"Tree" has one of my most favorite actors, James Dunn, who is
most well-known for three of the Shirley Temple movies he did.
That's not why I like him, it's just one of his perks.

saw Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? a long time ago. Isn't that the one with Joan Crawford and Bette Davis and one of them feeds the rat to the other one?

I've never even heard of Tree Grows in Brooklyn.

tame by modern standard or not, jane russell is hawt in that photo. rawr.

i bet that keitel / lydon movie is going to be an unwatchable clone of 48 Hours.

or whatever movie that was that had eddie murphy and nick nolte. or was it mel gibson? one is the LOOSE CANNON etc., the other is the entertaining black sidekick. i can't remember anything any more now that i'm almost old.

ane Russell was definitely teh hawt. I miss the full-figured bombshell look... I wish it'd come back in fashion.

The Keitel/Lydon movie is more of a dramatic genre film, so I don't know that the comparison will stick, but we'll see. Anecodtal reviews of it I've seen around the internet are somewhat favorable, some going as far to call it one of Keitel's under-rated gems. One thing about genre films, even the bad ones are pretty etertaining.

"I miss the full-figured bombshell look... I wish it'd come back in fashion."

Especially the "Well hold awn now whiles I go to the barn for more hay - Oh, hello!" type of pinups... Double-RAWR

Wasn't Harvey Keitel in Bad Lieutenant as well? Talk about being typecast into the lieutenant thing, huh?

I went on an Alfred Hitchcock binge in October due to one too many viewings of the always-on-Sundance documentary Dial H for Hitchcock. That, plus AMC had some Halloween Hitchcock Hoedown and they showed a lot of his movies on a continuous loop. Anyway, my favorite was Shadow of a Doubt.

o date, Rear Window is still my favorite Hitchcock film. It's actually one of my favorite movies, period. I've been fortunate enough to have seen it screened twice.

And Grace Kelly? RAWR

I have a hard time imagining another of his films will replace it, but based on the recommendation, I'll have to move Shadow Of A Doubt to the front of the Hitchcock films I have coming from Netflix.

There may be a better produced movie than Rear Window; but not one that I've seen. I don't mean that it's the best movie ever made, or my favorite (it does rate highly on my list); but in terms of direction, nothing superfluous or wasted, it's tops.

North by Northwest comes close; but strays in places, and - at least IMHO - is a little strained (or silly) on repeated viewings. I wouldn't argue too much with someone who wanted to rate Casablanca ahead of RW, because it's almost as tight, but more ambitious, and maybe a better screenplay.

Now, I am tempted to think of modern (last 30 years) movies that at least come close to these...

Found a Hitchcock boxed set of the entire catalog for 80 bucks at walmart yesterday. I was tempted to buy it, and probably would have if not for the 4 other DVDs I've bought and not yet watched. I haven't seen much of Hitchcock's work but love what I have.

Dude, if you like Hitchcock, you gotta see Rebecca!

ventually, I hope to see all of Hitchcock's films.

ooooh, I want to add to the list!

The City of Lost Children.
The Big Sleep
Un Chien Andalou

I adore all of these movies, for various reasons.

not the Quentin Tarintino endorsed copy of Hero! Yes, they changed the very most important line of the movie. Get the Chinese version.

"from the one-dimensional American cinema western characters who treat women like horses and vice-versa "

You mean horses treat women like one-dimensional western characters?
Boy, women get the raw deal either way, eh?
(No offense to any horses or one dimensional western characters out there)


  • 1